Especially if web browsing is all it takes to make them happy!Īs long as the project lives it's the intention that counts and there's good will at work it seems. ISO is the best that should be expected of people not yet familiar with Linux enough to see it as a real alternative. Thanks for the contribution of course, i'm simply wondering if every newbie is as brave as i was when i started this morning, some 6 hours earlier. Not to mention nothing happened when i doubled-clicked the Porteus package anyway. Too bad the hobby consumes time like a black hole sucks light! To be honest i didn't find an opportunity to at least evaluate all that i managed to put aside for later tests, so far. deb packages being downloaded too, so now i regret there's no Synaptic and/or a companion deb2xzm utility, while i suspect i should have tried to find some associated CLi command(s). Well, i was curious to find out where's the packages coming from and i seen. By the way, why not add aqemu-0.8.2.tar.bz2 to the list and also QEMU with it perhaps! In this case that's obviously genuine being hosted on a microsoft domain, in other it's from 3rd-parties as MediaFire in.
Not that this was hidden, but i'd have put automation as an option after offering access to manual installation for those who need to verify the origins of a source.
It's an occasion to comment that these cripts are only as up-to-date as their maintenance, while i believe it would be nearly just as fine just to provide the sources, for example:Ġ04-microsoft-edge-beta_92.0.902.22-1_amd64.xzm I'm certain that's going to give their motivation quite a fair boost, so it turns out i just downloaded it earlier this morning, though using the "Get Addon Packages" utily from 'Arch Porteus' 64-bits - i don't suppose Microsoft intends to support 32-bits as well but one can hope i guess. , 11:57The newcomers from Windows to Linux will for sure like it!
0 kommentar(er)
